I enjoyed the content and substance of this thought-provoking article very much, however a few typos ('eery' for 'eerie') and punctuation oddities (a parenthetical dash used on one and not the other, for example) nearly threw me off the page altogether. I hope you'll find the time to give it a good proofread or get another pair of eyes on it first before publishing, as otherwise it diminishes the value of the content - which in this case was indeed valuable.
I enjoyed the content and substance of this thought-provoking article very much, however a few typos ('eery' for 'eerie') and punctuation oddities (a parenthetical dash used on one and not the other, for example) nearly threw me off the page altogether. I hope you'll find the time to give it a good proofread or get another pair of eyes on it first before publishing, as otherwise it diminishes the value of the content - which in this case was indeed valuable.
Thanks for reading Jane. And for the feedback! Oh dear- I am so much better at proofreading others’ work than my own …